After the curious finding in my previous blog post, where a Partition's HighWaterMark was noticeably higher than that for a non-Partitioned Table but then shrunk on a MOVE operation, retrying the same rows with a different pattern of INSERT statements.
However, I am still sticking to a single session doing the INSERT (as I don't want ASSM spreading the incoming rows to different non-contiguous blocks)
This in 12.1.0.2
So, a Row-By-Row Insert still resulted in the the HWM being 3,022 and shrinking to 2,484 after a MOVE.
Let's try the same data-set in 11.2.0.4
So, 11.2.0.4 and 12.1.0.2 display the same behaviour for the Partition HWM. A HWM of 3,022 blocks shrinking to 2,484 blocks.
The next test would be with a larger AVG_ROW_LEN.
.
.
.
However, I am still sticking to a single session doing the INSERT (as I don't want ASSM spreading the incoming rows to different non-contiguous blocks)
This in 12.1.0.2
SQL> connect hemant/hemant
Connected.
SQL> create table part_table_3(id_column number(6), data_column varchar2(100))
2 partition by range (id_column)
3 (partition p_100 values less than (101),
4 partition p_200 values less than (201),
5 partition p_300 values less than (301),
6 partition p_400 values less than (401),
7 partition p_max values less than (maxvalue))
8 /
Table created.
SQL> insert into part_table_3 values (51,'Fifty One');
1 row created.
SQL>
SQL> commit;
Commit complete.
SQL> declare
cntr number;
begin
cntr := 0;
while cntr < 100000
loop
insert into part_table_3 values (25, 'New Row') ;
commit;
cntr := cntr + 1;
end loop;
end;
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL>
SQL> declare
cntr number;
begin
cntr := 0;
while cntr < 500001
loop
insert into part_table_3 values (55, 'New Row') ;
commit;
cntr := cntr + 1;
end loop;
end; 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL>
SQL> declare
cntr number;
begin
cntr := 0;
while cntr < 500001
loop
insert into part_table_3 values (45, 'New Row') ;
commit;
cntr := cntr + 1;
end loop;
end; 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> commit;
Commit complete.
SQL>
SQL> exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats('','PART_TABLE_3',granularity=>'ALL');
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL>
SQL> select avg_row_len, num_rows, blocks
from user_tab_partitions
where table_name = 'PART_TABLE_3'
and partition_name = 'P_100' 2 3 4
5 /
AVG_ROW_LEN NUM_ROWS BLOCKS
----------- ---------- ----------
11 1100003 3022
SQL>
SQL> alter table part_table_3 move partition p_100 ;
Table altered.
SQL> exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats('','PART_TABLE_3',granularity=>'ALL');
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> select avg_row_len, num_rows, blocks
from user_tab_partitions
where table_name = 'PART_TABLE_3'
and partition_name = 'P_100'
/ 2 3 4 5
AVG_ROW_LEN NUM_ROWS BLOCKS
----------- ---------- ----------
11 1100003 2484
SQL>
SQL> select extent_id, blocks
from dba_extents
where segment_name = 'PART_TABLE_3'
and segment_type = 'TABLE PARTITION'
and partition_name = 'P_100'
and owner = 'HEMANT'
order by 1
/ 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EXTENT_ID BLOCKS
---------- ----------
0 1024
1 1024
2 1024
SQL>
So, a Row-By-Row Insert still resulted in the the HWM being 3,022 and shrinking to 2,484 after a MOVE.
Let's try the same data-set in 11.2.0.4
SQL> connect hemant/hemant
Connected.
SQL> select * from v$version;
BANNER
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.4.0 - 64bit Production
PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.4.0 - Production
CORE 11.2.0.4.0 Production
TNS for Linux: Version 11.2.0.4.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.4.0 - Production
SQL>
SQL> create table part_table_3(id_column number(6), data_column varchar2(100))
partition by range (id_column)
(partition p_100 values less than (101),
partition p_200 values less than (201),
partition p_300 values less than (301),
partition p_400 values less than (401),
partition p_max values less than (maxvalue))
/
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Table created.
SQL> SQL> show parameter deferr
NAME TYPE VALUE
------------------------------------ ----------- ------------------------------
deferred_segment_creation boolean TRUE
SQL>
SQL> insert into part_table_3 values (51,'Fifty One');
1 row created.
SQL> commit;
Commit complete.
SQL>
SQL> declare
cntr number;
begin
cntr := 0;
while cntr < 100000
loop
insert into part_table_3 values (25, 'New Row') ;
commit;
cntr := cntr + 1;
end loop;
end; 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL>
SQL> declare
cntr number;
begin
cntr := 0;
while cntr < 500001
loop
insert into part_table_3 values (55, 'New Row') ;
commit;
cntr := cntr + 1;
end loop;
end; 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL>
SQL> declare
cntr number;
begin
cntr := 0;
while cntr < 500001
loop
insert into part_table_3 values (45, 'New Row') ;
commit;
cntr := cntr + 1;
end loop;
end;
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL>
SQL> exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats('','PART_TABLE_3',granularity=>'ALL');
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> select avg_row_len, num_rows, blocks
from user_tab_partitions
where table_name = 'PART_TABLE_3'
and partition_name = 'P_100'
/ 2 3 4 5
AVG_ROW_LEN NUM_ROWS BLOCKS
----------- ---------- ----------
11 1100003 3022
SQL>
SQL> alter table part_table_3 move partition p_100 ;
Table altered.
SQL> exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats('','PART_TABLE_3',granularity=>'ALL');
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> select avg_row_len, num_rows, blocks
from user_tab_partitions
where table_name = 'PART_TABLE_3'
and partition_name = 'P_100'
/ 2 3 4 5
AVG_ROW_LEN NUM_ROWS BLOCKS
----------- ---------- ----------
11 1100003 2484
SQL>
SQL> select extent_id, blocks
from dba_extents
where segment_name = 'PART_TABLE_3'
and segment_type = 'TABLE PARTITION'
and partition_name = 'P_100'
and owner = 'HEMANT'
order by 1
/ 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EXTENT_ID BLOCKS
---------- ----------
0 1024
1 1024
2 1024
SQL>
So, 11.2.0.4 and 12.1.0.2 display the same behaviour for the Partition HWM. A HWM of 3,022 blocks shrinking to 2,484 blocks.
The next test would be with a larger AVG_ROW_LEN.
.
.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment